Although neurologic Lyme disease is known to cause cognitive dysfunction in adults, little is known about its long-term sequelae in children.
A Controlled Study of Cognitive Deﬁcits in Children With Chronic Lyme Disease*
Felice A. Tager, Ph.D., Brian A. Fallon, M.D., John Keilp, Ph.D., Marian Rissenberg, Ph.D., Charles Ray Jones, M.D., Michael R. Liebowitz, M.D
Received August 7, 2000; revised January 3, 2001; accepted January 10, 2001. From the Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, Division of Behavioral Medicine, New York, New York. Address cor- respondence to Dr. Tager, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, Box 427, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: email@example.com.
Copyright 2001 American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 13:4, Fall 2001
* LDA has received permission to post this article in its entirety
Click here to view the entire pdf of this article
Although neurologic Lyme disease is known to cause cognitive dysfunction in adults, little is known about its long-term sequelae in children. Twenty children with a history of new-onset cognitive complaints after Lyme disease were compared with 20 matched healthy control subjects. Each child was assessed with measures of cognition and psychopathology. Children with Lyme disease had signiﬁcantly more cognitive and psychiatric disturbances. Cognitive deﬁcits were still found after controlling for anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Lyme disease in children may be accompanied by long-term neuropsychiatric disturbances, resulting in psychosocial and academic impairments. Areas for further study are discussed.
Lyme disease (LYD) is a multisystemic illness caused by the tick-borne spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb). LYD, the most common tick-borne illness in the United States, (1) may manifest in a variety of ways: dermatologic, arthritic, ophthalmologic, cardiac, and neuropsychiat- ric. (2) The incidence and spread of the disease increased during the 1980s,(3) stabilizing somewhat in the late 1990s. Children below the age of 9 are at a high risk for Bb infection, (4) with many new cases of Lyme occurring among persons younger than 14 years. (5)
The neuropsychiatric symptoms of LYD in adults have been described, (6,7) but little has been published about the neuropsychiatric effect of the disease in children and adolescents. In adults, deﬁcits in attention and memory have been reported. (8,9) In children, a controlled study of cognitive symptoms investigated a sample of all children and adolescents who presented to a LYD clinic, most of whom presented with rheumatological symptoms, had been diagnosed early, and had been treated appropriately for LD.(10) These children were found to have an excellent prognosis for unimpaired functioning. However, this sample may not be representative of all children diagnosed with LYD, especially those who present initially with neurocognitive problems and /or those who were not treated until many months after the initial infection. Our preliminary data using symptom-driven reports suggest that children who develop chronic LYD have psychiatric and cognitive difﬁculties in the area of attention and memory. (11) However, subjective reports of cognitive dysfunction are not often correlated with objective ﬁndings. In a case series, (12) 12 of 86 children (14%) developed neurocognitive symptoms associated with chronic LYD. If a subgroup of children develop cognitive problems associated with LYD, then teachers, parents, and physicians should be aware of this possibility. In addition, if our preliminary ﬁndings are replicated in a controlled study, then in Lyme-endemic areas it may be reasonable for LYD to be considered in the differential diagnosis of new-onset neurocognitive disorders in children and adolescents.
This study examined the question of whether a sub group of children with a history of LYD and persistent cognitive complaints have objective cognitive deﬁcits, independent of psychiatric comorbidity.
Children between 8 and 16 years of age were recruited. Twenty children with chronic LYD and 20 healthy control subjects were enrolled.
Children with a history of LYD who were symptomatic for 6 months to 3 years, with persistent cognitive complaints including memory problems, distractibility, and school decline, were referred by their pediatricians. The diagnosis of LYD was conﬁrmed based on a) history of exposure to a Lyme-endemic area, b) an illness course distinguished by symptoms characteristic of LYD, and c) either 1) history of a physician-documented erythema migrans (EM) rash or unambiguous EM described by a parent, or 2) history of a positive whole-blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for Bb or a positive Western blot meeting explicit current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. The CDC criteria for the immunoglobulin G Western blot (IgG WB) were broadened to recognize that the 31-kD and 34-kD bands represent the highly speciﬁc Osp A and B bands. Children were accepted into the study only if LYD infection occurred after completion of a marking period in school. This helped to establish good academic performance prior to the onset of LYD.
Twenty healthy control subjects with no history of LYD were included. An attempt was made to match the groups on gender, age, grade, and socioeconomic status determined by using Hollingshead occupational codes. (13) Healthy children were solicited through the families of children with LYD, including siblings, friends, and relatives. In addition, control subjects were recruited from ﬂyers posted at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, although many of these self-referred children were not eligible because they were not ﬂuent in English. Negative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blot tests were required for control subjects.
Eligibility for both groups was determined by an extensive phone screen with a physician (B.F.) and by documentation of a positive Western blot assay for the LYD group. No children were accepted into the study if there was a preexisting or pre-Lyme history of signiﬁcant diagnosed medical, neurologic, psychiatric, or learning problems (including, but not limited to, seizure disorder, head trauma, attention deﬁcit disorders, learning disability, and conduct disorder). Healthy control subjects were not included if they presented with a signiﬁcant history of any of the following symptoms: arthralgias /arthritis, recurrent neck pain or headache, marked fatigue, EM rash, or cranial /radicular neuropathies. Control subjects were not selected as “super-normals,” since we included all children unless there were marked medical or psychiatric problems.
All procedures were conducted at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, where parents and children gave signed informed consent and were asked to avoid disclosing the diagnostic group of the child.
All subjects were administered a neuropsychological battery selected in part to replicate a previous pediatric LYD study. (10) Tests were administered in a standardized manner and in a systematic order. The cognitive domains assessed included 1) general intelligence, using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III (WISC- III); (14) 2) short-term memory for visual and verbal material, using subtests of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML); (15) 3) learning of new verbal and nonverbal material, using subtests of the WRAML; 4) attention, using the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test (CPT); (16) 5) executive functioning, using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) (17); and 6) language, using the word association subtest of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals. (18)
Prior to testing, all children completed a Likert-type scale for physical symptoms, assessing fatigue, joint pain, previous night’s sleep, appetite, headache, and other pain, as well as the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI) (19) and the Youth Self-Report (YSR). (20)
Parents completed a general information questionnaire and a physical symptom checklist (rating symptom severity and frequency over the past year). Parents rated learning and attention problems on the Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-48) (21) and psychopathology on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). (20) Because the present study is not a longitudinal one, the children had no pre-Lyme cognitive assessment. Given that limitation, school grades and standardized achievement test scores were used as an indirect way to assess premorbid cognitive functioning. School records were obtained for the current year and all years starting from the disease onset. Premorbid standardized achievement test scores were also obtained.
Statistical analyses were conducted by using SPSS 7.5. The continuous demographic variable of age was contrasted between the two groups by independent-sample t-tests. Demographic variables of socioeconomic class and sex were analyzed between the groups by t-test and chi-square analysis. The neuropsychological test results as well as the self- and parent-report questionnaires were compared by using independent-sample t-tests for the various indices and subtests. Test performance between the groups was also analyzed by analysis of co-variance to control separately for differences in Verbal Comprehension, depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Bonferroni correction was applied separately to groups of indices and subtests of the measures to correct for multiple comparisons. Results before and after Bonferroni correction are presented for the reader ’s information. The CPT’s overall assessment of the presence, absence, or possibility of attentional problems was compared between the groups by chi-square analysis. When available, analyses were done using standardized scores procured from published age-corrected normative data. All hypothesis-testing was two-tailed. A P-value of < 0.05 was applied for signiﬁcance.
Twenty children were eligible for the study, and all agreed to participate. There were 13 females and 7 males (mean age 13.83 +/- 2.41 years; mean mean +/- SD reported throughout). All children were Caucasian, ﬂuent in English, and, consistent with the demographics of Lyme disease, all but one came from middle- or upper-class families. The mean age at diagnosis was 11.90 +/- 2.85 years. The mean number of physicians consulted before the diagnosis of LYD was 3.80 +/- 4.48. The mean time since diagnosis was 74.95 +/- 68.04 weeks; from parent reported symptom onset until diagnosis, 47.28 +/- 44.41 weeks; and from diagnosis to treatment, less than 1 week (0.30 +/- 0.92). Thus, these children were symptomatic for many months before being diagnosed and treated.
Of the 20 children with LYD, 16 (80%) had a fully reactive WB and 6 (30%) had a history of an unambiguous EM rash. Of the 4 without a reactive WB, 3 had both well-documented EM rashes and 4 /5 bands on an IgG WB, and 1 had a positive whole-blood PCR for Bb DNA and frank arthritis.
All of the children had received oral antibiotics (mean=23.21 +/- 21.99 weeks), and 11 had received intravenous antibiotics (8.79 +/- 16.10 weeks). All initially beneﬁted from antibiotic therapy, but improvement was sustained in only 10% (2 /20) after oral antibiotics and in 36% (4 /11) after IV antibiotics. At the time of testing, 7 children (35%) were being treated with oral antibiotics and 2 (10%) were being treated with IV antibiotics.
Based on physician assessment, the most common symptoms during LYD were marked fatigue (100%), arthralgias (100%), frequent and severe headaches (100%), irritability /depression (94%), short-term memory problems (94%), schoolwork deterioration (94%), myalgias (88%), brain fog (88%), neck pain (88%), insomnia (82%), distractibility (82%), word-ﬁnding problems (82%), and severe ﬂu (80%). Arthritis was noted in only 38% of the sample. On the more extensive parent-rated questionnaire, children were rated as having moderate to severe sensory hyperacusis to sound (58%) and /or light (74%); insomnia (77%); word-ﬁnding problems (79%); and radicular pains (56%).
Thirteen females and 7 males (mean age=13.53 +/ 2.67 years) were entered into the study as healthy control subjects. Nine of these children were siblings of children in the LYD group, 6 were friends of children in the LYD group, and 5 were recruited independently. All children were Caucasian and English-speaking. No signiﬁcant age, sex, or socioeconomic differences were found between the two groups.
Neuropsychological Testing: Performance of the groups on the neuropsychological measures was compared (see Table 1). On two generally accepted measures of pre-served premorbid intellectual functioning (Vocabulary and Verbal Comprehension Index), the two groups were not signiﬁcantly different. On other indices, however, the LYD group had signiﬁcantly lower scores: Full Scale IQ; Performance IQ; the Perceptual /Organization and Freedom from Distractibility indices of the WISC-III; and the General Memory, Verbal Memory, and Visual Memory indices of the WRAML. The LYD group had signiﬁcantly lower scores on the digit span, picture completion, coding, and block design subtests of the WISC-III. They had signiﬁcantly lower scores on the design memory, story memory, ﬁnger windows, sentence memory, and number /letter subtests of the WRAML. The LYD group had signiﬁcantly greater difﬁculty maintaining set on the WCST. The CPT data are available only for a subset of the subjects because this version of the test was added mid-study. Despite the small n (9 LYD, 14 Healthy), there was a strong trend for the LYD group to have greater attentional difﬁculties. There was a signiﬁcantly greater frequency of deﬁnite attention problems in the LYD group than in the control subjects (9:1; P=0.007). After correction for multiple comparisons, Performance IQ, General Memory Index, Verbal Memory Index, and ﬁnger windows remained signiﬁcant.
Click here to view pdf of this article that includes TABLE 1. Neuropsychological measures and results in the Lyme disease and healthy control groups.
Premorbid Academic Achievement: School grades indicated children in the control group were functioning in the above-average range.
Pre-LYD school grades indicated children in the LYD group had been functioning in the above-average range. Premorbid standardized achievement test scores were available for 14 children (70%) in the LYD group. Eight of 14 children (57%) had scores greater than 90%, 3 (22%) in the 80%–89% range, 1 (7%) in the 70%–79% range, 1 (7%) in the 60%–69% range, and 1 (7%) in the 50%–59% range. For the 6 who were missing standardized tests, pre-Lyme report card grades of A’s and B’s indicated above-average functioning in school.
Physical Symptoms and Psychopathology: The LYD group had signiﬁcantly elevated scores on all measures of physical distress and parent /child-reported psychopathology. After controlling for multiple comparisons, most scales remained signiﬁcantly different (Table 2). Regarding depression, parents indicated that 41% (7/17) of children with LYD had suicidal thoughts and 11% (2 /18) had made a suicide gesture. On the child rating (CDI), 40% (8 /20) had suicidal thoughts. The LYD group scored far worse on measures of learning problems and hyperactivity: almost 7 SD above the control subjects’ mean on the CPRS Learning Problems scale, and 5 SD above the controls’ mean on the Hyperactivity Index scale.
Because affective disorders inﬂuence cognitive performance, the data were analyzed in an attempt to control these potentially confounding variables. Depression did not account for group differences in Perceptual /Organizational Index (P=0.050), General Memory Index (P=0.045), Verbal Memory Index (P=0.021), digit span (P=0.045), coding (P=0.002), design memory (P=0.034), finger windows (P=0.011), or number/letter (P=0.003). Parent-rated anxiety did not account for differences in Performance IQ (P=0.027), Visual Memory Index (P=0.049), coding (P=0.038), finger windows (P=0.005), or number/letter (P=0.038). Self-ratings of fatigue did not account for differences in digit span (P=0.038), finger windows (P=0.016), or number/letter (P=0.024). When we attempted to statistically control for depression, anxiety, and fatigue together, three non-independent variables, group comparisons for many index and subtest scores failed to attain statistical significance. However, finger windows (P=0.022) and number/letter (P=0.010), two important tests of visual and auditory processing, continued to be significantly different between the groups.